Sexism’s Shifting Trends How Bias Has Evolved

September 24, 2026

Share this article

Animal Nepotism

The practice of favoring relatives or friends for jobs or promotions involves several systemic and organizational disadvantages:

Managers may find it hard to be fair when supervising family members. This complicates reviews, discipline, and pay talks because personal feelings get involved.

Close personal relationships often involve a ‘shorthand’ communication style. This can lead to faster decision-making and a more unified vision at the executive level, as goals and perspectives often align.

What is Nepotism in the Workplace?

Favoritism, Nepotism, and Legacy Employees https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-6r_v-tVr0

Men Being Harassed at Work by Women

Sexism has not magically disappeared in this enlightened millennium but has simply changed its appearance, with some benign male leaders taking females under their executive wing, but insisting on keeping them there. Usually when we talk of sexism, we first think primarily of female sexual harassment complaints; however, close to a quarter of all sexual harassment complaints filed are made by men. This naturally makes one wonder about all the unreported cases. Are you a man who has quietly suffered inappropriate female behavior at work? Are you a woman who was ‘just messing round and having some fun,’ with innocent intent?

The Scale (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Official Data)

  • Between FY2018 – 2021, men filed 21.8% of all sexual harassment charges with the EEOC — a real, meaningful minority share, not a negligible one.
  • Over the past decade, 16–18% of all sexual harassment complaints received by the EEOC were filed by men.
  • Legal experts explicitly note this likely understates the true frequency: a law firm analysis states plainly, "this representation is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg," pointing to gender stereotypes that make it harder for men to report — specifically the cultural assumption that "men are usually the perpetrators and not victims" of harassment.

A specific, documented case: EEOC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill                 

A 22-year-old male employee was propositioned and groped by his female manager 

during shifts. The manager also posted a sexually explicit ‘scoreboard’ tracking staff members' private sex lives in the main office. When the employee complained, coworkers retaliated against him, and he was ultimately forced to resign. Chipotle settled with the EEOC for $95,000 paid directly to him. This is just one example of male sexual harassment cases that seldom make sensational news.

Three Specific Shifts in Corporate Sexism: 1980s to Today

Shift 1: From "Glass Ceiling" to "Broken Rung" — The Barrier Moved Downward in the Pipeline

The 1980s framing                                                            

In 1978, HR executive Marilyn Loden coined the term at a Women's Exposition panel in New York City, arguing the real issue wasn't women's behavior but structural barriers: "there was an 'invisible glass ceiling' standing in the way of their aspirations and opportunities." This became the dominant metaphor for decades — the assumption was that women faced discrimination near the top of the corporate ladder. What a massive miscalculation!

 

The modern reframing                                                       

In LeanIn.Org and McKinsey's Women in the Workplace report — the largest ongoing study of women in corporate America — introduced a data-driven correction: "The broken rung, not the glass ceiling, is the primary driver of gender disparity in corporate leadership.”

— Women in the Workplace, LeanIn.Org & McKinsey & Company.

McKinsey senior partner Alexis Krivkovich explained the shift directly to ABC News in 2019: "So much attention has really gone to the glass ceiling, but the largest number of women affected are women at the beginning of their careers... You can't solve the problem until you first recognize that it is one."

The data itself

For every 100 men promoted from entry-level to manager, only 81 women received the same promotion in 2024 — improving slightly to 93 women by 2025. For women of color, the gap remains far wider: just 74 per 100 men in 2025 (with Lean In's own report citing an even starker breakdown — only 60 Black women and 82 Asian/Latina women promoted per 100 men).

Shift 2: From Silence and Disbelief to Legal/Cultural Accountability (Anita Hill → #MeToo)

1991 — the baseline                                                        

When Anita Hill testified before an all-white, all-male Senate Judiciary Committee that Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas had sexually harassed her, it was, per USC Annenberg's account, "the first time that many Americans... had ever heard about sexual harassment in the 

workplace." Public opinion was split on whether even to believe her, and Thomas was confirmed regardless. Now we expect sexual harassment as commonplace, as it is with entitled celebrities, wealthy businesspersons, and disgraced politicians. 

The direct throughline to today  

                                           

A historian and legal scholar quoted in HISTORY.com's retrospective states plainly:

"I think that #MeToo has roots in the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearing, in Anita Hill's extraordinary testimony, and in the strength of her character."
— Marcia Greenberger, cited in How Anita Hill's Testimony Made America Cringe—And Change, HISTORY.com

 

Hill herself has been explicit that the cultural reckoning could have arrived 26 years earlier had institutions responded differently:

"If the Senate Judiciary Committee, led then by Mr. Biden, had done its job... the cultural shift we saw in 2017 after #MeToo might have begun in 1991 — with the support of the government."
— Anita Hill, New York Times op-ed, quoted via CNN (2019)

 

But — and this is the honest, important caveat — Hill argues the shift is incomplete.

 As recently as 2024, she noted:

"...the processes for doing so don't allow for much accountability on the part of corporations and the people who are engaging in abusive behavior."
— Anita Hill, TODAY.com, March 2024

 

What measurably did change      

                                               

USC Annenberg, following the 1991 hearings, sexual harassment claims filed with the EEOC shot up, and Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991, giving victims real legal recourse for the first time — a concrete legal-infrastructure shift that didn't exist in the earlier 80s corporate environment.

Shift 3: From a Two-Thirds Pay Gap to a Persistent-but-Narrower Gap — With Motherhood as the New Dividing Line

The 1980s baseline  

                                                      

Women earned roughly 65 cents for every dollar men earned in 1982.

 

Today’s Pay Reality


That gap has narrowed to roughly 82–85 cents per dollar — genuine, measurable progress over four decades. But recent data show the gap has essentially relocated: it now concentrates heavily around motherhood, not gender alone. Working mothers earn just 74.3 cents for every dollar earned by fathers — a gap nearly as wide as the entire national gender gap was in 1982, but now isolated specifically around parental status.

This reflects a real conceptual shift in how researchers frame the problem—from "women vs. men" broadly in the 80s to a more precise "motherhood penalty vs. fatherhood premium" framework today, which didn't exist as a distinct analytical category in 1980s corporate discourse. 

Woman-on-Woman Corporate Sexism: The Emerging Research

The Core Phenomenon: "Queen Bee Syndrome"


The most established framework describes cases where women in leadership positions act antagonistically toward female subordinates—a dynamic researcher have studied for decades, but that has recently drawn renewed academic attention.

According to a definitive 2025 study, Queen Bees exhibit three specific patterns:

  1. They display masculine rather than feminine traits.
  2. They physically and psychologically distance themselves from other women.
  3. They accept and support the existing gender hierarchy, rather than challenging it.

The underlying mechanism, per researcher Narcikara (2018), cited in the study: women in male-dominated workplaces often feel pressured to "negotiate masculine standards that would normally exclude them from managerial positions... they feel obligated to conceal their femininity, and they begin to lose themselves" — a survival adaptation that then gets turned outward against other women rather than challenged structurally.

 

Real, Documented Consequences



A qualitative study of seven women in education found the Queen Bee dynamic produces genuine workplace harm, not just interpersonal friction:

"The most significant theme that emerged from these stories is the prevalence of abusive behavior and workplace incivility from female supervisors toward their female subordinates due 

to their destructive leadership styles... manipulation, sabotage, and gas-lighting by their 'Queen Bee' superiors."     — Unraveling the Queen Bee Phenomenon, University of Windsor (2025)

 

Separate research (Stark et al.) found Queen Bee Syndrome directly correlates with increased anger, despair, and anxiety among affected subordinates, and measurably raises employee turnover intentions — meaning this isn't just an uncomfortable dynamic; it has real retention and mental-health costs for organizations, not to mention the impact on the bottom-line. 

The Genuinely New Development: "Worker Bee Syndrome"s

A 2025 study published in Frontiers in Sociology introduces a novel reverse dynamic that hadn't been formally named before:

"The 'Worker Bee Syndrome,' a reversal dynamic in which workers show bias against female leaders, is introduced in the study... Findings show that subconscious biases against female superiors may be prevalent among female subordinates, that are comparable to the behaviors typically linked to Queen Bee Syndrome."
— Baykal & Surucu, Frontiers in Sociology, Vol. 10 (2025)

 

This qualitative study of nine female professionals across industries found four recurring themes in subordinates' unconscious bias against their own female bosses:

  1. Preference for male leaders over female ones
  2. Perceived difficulties with female managers — specifically citing ‘meticulousness and emotional reactivity’ as complaints
  3. Divergent views about what female leadership should look like
  4. Internalized social expectations shaping how female authority is judged

 

The researchers' central, important conclusion: this "raises doubt on assumptions of unidirectional workplace enmity" — meaning the old model (only powerful women mistreating junior women) is incomplete. The bias runs both directions simultaneously, often unconsciously, which is a genuinely newer and more nuanced framing than the original 1970s-era ‘Queen Bee’ concept alone. As Queen Bees harass worker bees, worker bees also antagonize Queen Bees.

Given the new face of sexism, what can be done to educate and train workers, especially younger supervisors, about respecting the dignity of the individual? Clearly, the root cause of some sexism may be a sincere underlying, historic belief in the inherent inferiority of women held by men who know no better. After all, men tend to be bigger and stronger than women, a rational case for not including biological men in female sports.

Perhaps you disagree with me; however, I firmly believe that although some women leaders have made great strides in reclaiming their power in corporate America, for the most part, sexism still pervades our modern workplaces. The new sexism is subtler than decades ago, and may be, in some cases, harder to detect. However, the fact is that it absolutely, ultimately, and negatively impacts the bottom line.

 

-Frank DeDominicis

REFERENCES 

ACLU: Dismantling Sexual Harassment

 

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sexisms-shifting-trends-frank-dedominicis-krshc

Description: Sexism in the workplace hasn't disappeared — it's changed shape. Let’s track that shift with data and research: from the ‘glass ceiling’ to the ‘broken rung,’ a pay gap now tied closely to motherhood, and newly documented bias dynamics like Queen Bee and Worker Bee syndrome. The goal is simple — see the new sexism clearly enough to actually address it.

Recent Posts

September 25, 2026
I will start with only one word. Not a headline, not a statistic, only a single word that followed me around a conference room in downtown Denver in May of 2026 as I mingled with Colorado’s largest manufacturing executives. I was participating in the 52nd World Trade Day Conference, the largest international gathering of international trade professionals, policymakers, and business leaders. This year’s theme was blunt: “A New Era in Trade: Globalization in Question.” The keynote wasn’t about growth strategy or market expansion. It was titled “Safeguarding Trade in a Weaponized World Economy.” Every speaker I listened to and every hallway conversation I eavesdropped on kept circling back to that same word. Not tariffs, not GDP, not affordability, but ‘uncertainty.’ The word ‘uncertainty’ isn’t just a trade-conference buzzword. It’s showing up everywhere. Meanwhile, economists who track something called the World Uncertainty Index — a measure built from language in global news coverage — clocked its highest reading in more than three decades of data earlier this year. The index’s newest national poll found that nearly half of adults say they’re more anxious than they were a year ago — and when researchers asked people what’s driving that anxiety, the economy topped the list, with roughly seven in ten adults reporting they feel anxious about it. And uncertainty is not confined to our minds and our markets. It’s in the terra firma beneath us. Geophysicists studying the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults in Southern California recently reported that the two faults are carrying more accumulated stress than at any point in the last thousand years. If they were to rupture together through the Cajon Pass, researchers estimate the resulting earthquake could reach magnitude 7.4 to 7.8 — enough to simultaneously disrupt highways, rail lines, and energy corridors across multiple cities.
September 25, 2026
The necessity of integrating the EverythingDiSC™ profile into vocational training for people with disabilities is rooted in its ability to facilitate deeply personalized and meaningful career planning, a crucial element for ensuring successful employment outcomes. It acknowledges that job success relies far more on behavioral competencies than on technical ones.
September 25, 2026
Arthur Schlesinger Schlesinger was born in Columbus, Ohio, the son of Elizabeth Harriet (nee Bancroft) and Arthur M. Schlesinger (!888-1965), an influential historian at Ohio State University. His paternal grandfather was a Prussian Jew who converted to Protestantism and married an Austrian Catholic. According to family tradition, his mother, a Mayflower descendant, was of German and New England ancestry and a relative of historian George Bancroft. Schlesinger practiced Unitarianism. As a writer, I am confronted with three problems: 1. Everyone reading this has unexamined biases. 2. Embedded biases can color how one perceives stories of religious intolerance. 3. Gross ignorance. I am figuring out how to please everybody who reads this; however, I welcome intelligent argument if you think I'm off. I do not proselytize for any religion but hope every individual will map their path of faith, even if it is a path of no faith. Just identify your spiritual horizon and head for it. Simple. What I know is all that I know, a finite library of cerebral knowledge. Outside that subjective reality lies a vast universe of ignorance, my reason for open-mindedness and humility. At my core, I'm a perma-skeptic who continually questions everything, especially long-embedded personal 'truths' and hidden biases. Notwithstanding actual apparitions, I tend not to believe abstract concepts unless they are carefully and logically derived through reason and are perceived by my senses. If I think I hear divine voices speaking to me, am I crazy? Or am I receiving the voice of God speaking to me through the megaphone of conscience, just like Joan d'Arc? I don't know. That's why I explore this subject with you. I'm blessed or cursed with being born with an extreme curiosity about everything and how everything indescribably connects to everything else. Please receive this report for awareness, not necessarily agreement with every point. I could make mistakes, so please don't crucify the piano player. Aware that this report will be read by everyone, from non-practicing or devout Christians to befuddled agnostics and confirmed atheists, I strive to communicate in a way that reports, educates, and contributes to understanding differences and their core reasons. Knowing how belief systems directly affect one's worldview and behavior is helpful as you may lead, manage, or interact with people. Are Catholics more hopeful because a scapular guarantees salvation? Are Protestants more negative because of a focus on our inherently sinful nature? Remember that I am not a theologian, so feel free to challenge whatever you disagree with or want to provide correction. I'm a teacher, not a preacher. On all matters, I take a Socratic approach, always searching for higher-quality questions, as in AI prompt engineering.
September 25, 2026
Historical Context and Ubiquity
September 25, 2026
My Refrigerator as Metaphor for Tariff Stressors
September 24, 2026
How many psychoactive drugs can you identify?
John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy at a congressional hearing, illustrating a discussion of nepotism in public office.
By Frank DeDominicis • September 22, 2026
Explore the risks and potential benefits of nepotism through historical, political and workplace examples and what fair leadership requires.
August 10, 2026
Generally speaking, most adults consider play as something extra after the to-do list is completed, a reward for accomplishing a task, or a diversion from something serious and heavy. In actuality, it should be considered vital for mental health because, without it, we ignore the child in us who wants to explore, test, and play. Play is inherent in human and animal natures.  Being in the early days of Act III of life and preparing for a good death, I am more serious about things and consciously scheduling play times. I assign play equal weight, if not greater, to other life priorities such as work, worship, friendship, and love. I've enjoyed many hobbies that provide great satisfaction, but with aging, I've pared them down to only a few. If I were to live as long as my centenarian mother, I have time to read only 1000 new books, so I'd better carefully choose what I put into my head. Likewise, protecting play time is essential to my mental health.
August 10, 2026
Lest you mistake this article for a Timothy Learyesque' drop-out' message, I'd like to be clear. While retreat is a common tactic in war, it is intended to help regain posture and consolidate power resources, rather than abandoning the battlefield. Thanks to the internet, many of us are bombarded daily with cognitive overload from useless information, if we allow such abuse. Unfortunately, constantly staring at screens has become the norm for many humans. It is estimated that approximately 70% of the world's population, or nearly 5.775 billion people as of July 2025, is online. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?  The answer is that it is both. The internet has dramatically shrunk and flattened our world of communication, which is excellent for collaborative ventures, but which also benefits malicious actions by begrudged individuals.
August 10, 2026
Given the current state of social devolution (a term used to describe the decline in social interactions and relationships,) I'm fortunate to have been rated on a managerial whole-brain profile as an ambivert. Like most people, I naturally feel a strong and continuing need for social connection; however, I can also be perfectly content with solitude and meditation for extended periods. Socializing is natural for me. I quickly and easily build rapport and trust. Thus, my social world acts as a reservoir of good energy to recharge and remind me of who I am whenever I need a confidence boost, as I likewise edify my friends and allies. Being cocooned and busy helping e-commerce businesses, I hardly noticed the lockdown. However, as a friend said, "the pandemic revealed the rocks in the bottom of the creek." One study claimed that 64% of the people surveyed said they find it difficult to talk with people of widely different religious or political views. Why is this so? Perhaps we are so invested in our point of view that we cannot, or do not suspend self-interest for a few minutes to assume a sincerely curious, journalistic attitude like Monica Guzman, author of I Never Thought of It That Way.' She claims, "The friction and heat in a conversation is good. The question is whether it's cooking something or burning something. Standing for what you believe in does not mean attacking people on the other side." Indeed, the lockdown exacerbated the tone of relationships. Those who were close sought to become even closer. Those who were distant increased their transactional tone of communications, a term used to describe interactions primarily focused on exchanging information or completing tasks rather than building relationships. The report reveals a steady downward trend in social connection and civility over the past four decades. This slippery slope trend is borne out in a pithy white paper by the U.S. Surgeon General entitled Given the extensive nature of the paper, I will comment on only a few striking excerpts, which I hope encourages you to read the entire report.
Show More