Sexism’s Shifting Trends How Bias Has Evolved
Animal Nepotism
The practice of favoring relatives or friends for jobs or promotions involves several systemic and organizational disadvantages:
Managers may find it hard to be fair when supervising family members. This complicates reviews, discipline, and pay talks because personal feelings get involved.
Close personal relationships often involve a ‘shorthand’ communication style. This can lead to faster decision-making and a more unified vision at the executive level, as goals and perspectives often align.
What is Nepotism in the Workplace?
Favoritism, Nepotism, and Legacy Employees https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-6r_v-tVr0
Overdose Deaths Decline, Fentanyl Threat Looms – KCSR / KBPY. https://chadronradio.com/overdose-deaths-decline-fentanyl-threat-looms/
Implications of Substance Use Disorders for Employers American Substance Abuse Professionals, Inc. https://go2asap.com/blog/implications_substance_use_disorders_employers/
Printer Friendly - ChemicalRecovery.Org.
https://www.chemicalrecovery.org/print.php?news.236
With The Highest Addiction Rates - Toxicomanie Aide. https://www.toxicomanie.org/jobs-with-the-highest-addiction-rates/
How to Calm Down - What's Under the Hood? https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mDWFY8Q2m0ekSsTSgGNhY33HtLJ0VKt9/view?usp=drive_link
Overdose Deaths Decline, Fentanyl Threat Looms – KCSR / KBPY. https://chadronradio.com/overdose-deaths-decline-fentanyl-threat-looms/
Unintentional overdoses rose for the ninth consecutive year in 2021: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2023/unintentional-overdoses-rose-for-the-ninth-consecutive-year-in-2021.htm#:~:text=Unintentional%20overdoses%20rose%20for%20the%20ninth%20consecutive%20year%20in%202021,-August%2014%2C%202023&text=There%20were%20464%20workplace%20fatalities,the%20ninth%20consecutive%20annual%20increase.
The Economics Daily: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2023/unintentional-overdoses-rose-for-the-ninth-consecutive-year-in-2021.htm
Men Being Harassed at Work by Women
Sexism has not magically disappeared in this enlightened millennium but has simply changed its appearance, with some benign male leaders taking females under their executive wing, but insisting on keeping them there. Usually when we talk of sexism, we first think primarily of female sexual harassment complaints; however, close to a quarter of all sexual harassment complaints filed are made by men. This naturally makes one wonder about all the unreported cases. Are you a man who has quietly suffered inappropriate female behavior at work? Are you a woman who was ‘just messing round and having some fun,’ with innocent intent?
The Scale (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Official Data)
- Between FY2018 – 2021, men filed 21.8% of all sexual harassment charges with the EEOC — a real, meaningful minority share, not a negligible one.
- Over the past decade, 16–18% of all sexual harassment complaints received by the EEOC were filed by men.
- Legal experts explicitly note this likely understates the true frequency: a law firm analysis states plainly, "this representation is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg," pointing to gender stereotypes that make it harder for men to report — specifically the cultural assumption that "men are usually the perpetrators and not victims" of harassment.
A specific, documented case: EEOC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill
A 22-year-old male employee was propositioned and groped by his female manager
during shifts. The manager also posted a sexually explicit ‘scoreboard’ tracking staff members' private sex lives in the main office. When the employee complained, coworkers retaliated against him, and he was ultimately forced to resign. Chipotle settled with the EEOC for $95,000 paid directly to him. This is just one example of male sexual harassment cases that seldom make sensational news.
Three Specific Shifts in Corporate Sexism: 1980s to Today
Shift 1: From "Glass Ceiling" to "Broken Rung" — The Barrier Moved Downward in the Pipeline
The 1980s framing
In 1978, HR executive Marilyn Loden coined the term at a Women's Exposition panel in New York City, arguing the real issue wasn't women's behavior but structural barriers: "there was an 'invisible glass ceiling' standing in the way of their aspirations and opportunities." This became the dominant metaphor for decades — the assumption was that women faced discrimination near the top of the corporate ladder. What a massive miscalculation!
The modern reframing
In LeanIn.Org and McKinsey's Women in the Workplace report — the largest ongoing study of women in corporate America — introduced a data-driven correction: "The broken rung, not the glass ceiling, is the primary driver of gender disparity in corporate leadership.”
— Women in the Workplace, LeanIn.Org & McKinsey & Company.

McKinsey senior partner Alexis Krivkovich explained the shift directly to ABC News in 2019: "So much attention has really gone to the glass ceiling, but the largest number of women affected are women at the beginning of their careers... You can't solve the problem until you first recognize that it is one."
The data itself
For every 100 men promoted from entry-level to manager, only 81 women received the same promotion in 2024 — improving slightly to 93 women by 2025. For women of color, the gap remains far wider: just 74 per 100 men in 2025 (with Lean In's own report citing an even starker breakdown — only 60 Black women and 82 Asian/Latina women promoted per 100 men).

Shift 2: From Silence and Disbelief to Legal/Cultural Accountability (Anita Hill → #MeToo)
1991 — the baseline
When Anita Hill testified before an all-white, all-male Senate Judiciary Committee that Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas had sexually harassed her, it was, per USC Annenberg's account, "the first time that many Americans... had ever heard about sexual harassment in the
workplace." Public opinion was split on whether even to believe her, and Thomas was confirmed regardless. Now we expect sexual harassment as commonplace, as it is with entitled celebrities, wealthy businesspersons, and disgraced politicians.
The direct throughline to today
A historian and legal scholar quoted in HISTORY.com's retrospective states plainly:
"I think that #MeToo has roots in the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearing, in Anita Hill's extraordinary testimony, and in the strength of her character."
— Marcia Greenberger, cited in How Anita Hill's Testimony Made America Cringe—And Change, HISTORY.com
Hill herself has been explicit that the cultural reckoning could have arrived 26 years earlier had institutions responded differently:
"If the Senate Judiciary Committee, led then by Mr. Biden, had done its job... the cultural shift we saw in 2017 after #MeToo might have begun in 1991 — with the support of the government."
— Anita Hill, New York Times op-ed, quoted via CNN (2019)
But — and this is the honest, important caveat — Hill argues the shift is incomplete.
As recently as 2024, she noted:
"...the processes for doing so don't allow for much accountability on the part of corporations and the people who are engaging in abusive behavior."
— Anita Hill, TODAY.com, March 2024
What measurably did change
USC Annenberg, following the 1991 hearings, sexual harassment claims filed with the EEOC shot up, and Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991, giving victims real legal recourse for the first time — a concrete legal-infrastructure shift that didn't exist in the earlier 80s corporate environment.

Shift 3: From a Two-Thirds Pay Gap to a Persistent-but-Narrower Gap — With Motherhood as the New Dividing Line
The 1980s baseline
Women earned roughly 65 cents for every dollar men earned in 1982.
Today’s Pay Reality
That gap has narrowed to roughly 82–85 cents per dollar — genuine, measurable progress over four decades. But recent data show the gap has essentially relocated: it now concentrates heavily around motherhood, not gender alone. Working mothers earn just 74.3 cents for every dollar earned by fathers — a gap nearly as wide as the entire national gender gap was in 1982, but now isolated specifically around parental status.
This reflects a real conceptual shift in how researchers frame the problem—from "women vs. men" broadly in the 80s to a more precise "motherhood penalty vs. fatherhood premium" framework today, which didn't exist as a distinct analytical category in 1980s corporate discourse.

Woman-on-Woman Corporate Sexism: The Emerging Research
The Core Phenomenon: "Queen Bee Syndrome"
The most established framework describes cases where women in leadership positions act antagonistically toward female subordinates—a dynamic researcher have studied for decades, but that has recently drawn renewed academic attention.
According to a definitive 2025 study, Queen Bees exhibit three specific patterns:
- They display masculine rather than feminine traits.
- They physically and psychologically distance themselves from other women.
- They accept and support the existing gender hierarchy, rather than challenging it.
The underlying mechanism, per researcher Narcikara (2018), cited in the study: women in male-dominated workplaces often feel pressured to "negotiate masculine standards that would normally exclude them from managerial positions... they feel obligated to conceal their femininity, and they begin to lose themselves" — a survival adaptation that then gets turned outward against other women rather than challenged structurally.
Real, Documented Consequences
A qualitative study of seven women in education found the Queen Bee dynamic produces genuine workplace harm, not just interpersonal friction:
"The most significant theme that emerged from these stories is the prevalence of abusive behavior and workplace incivility from female supervisors toward their female subordinates due
to their destructive leadership styles... manipulation, sabotage, and gas-lighting by their 'Queen Bee' superiors." — Unraveling the Queen Bee Phenomenon, University of Windsor (2025)
Separate research (Stark et al.) found Queen Bee Syndrome directly correlates with increased anger, despair, and anxiety among affected subordinates, and measurably raises employee turnover intentions — meaning this isn't just an uncomfortable dynamic; it has real retention and mental-health costs for organizations, not to mention the impact on the bottom-line.
The Genuinely New Development: "Worker Bee Syndrome"s
A 2025 study published in Frontiers in Sociology introduces a novel reverse dynamic that hadn't been formally named before:
"The 'Worker Bee Syndrome,' a reversal dynamic in which workers show bias against female leaders, is introduced in the study... Findings show that subconscious biases against female superiors may be prevalent among female subordinates, that are comparable to the behaviors typically linked to Queen Bee Syndrome."
— Baykal & Surucu, Frontiers in Sociology, Vol. 10 (2025)
This qualitative study of nine female professionals across industries found four recurring themes in subordinates' unconscious bias against their own female bosses:
- Preference for male leaders over female ones
- Perceived difficulties with female managers — specifically citing ‘meticulousness and emotional reactivity’ as complaints
- Divergent views about what female leadership should look like
- Internalized social expectations shaping how female authority is judged
The researchers' central, important conclusion: this "raises doubt on assumptions of unidirectional workplace enmity" — meaning the old model (only powerful women mistreating junior women) is incomplete. The bias runs both directions simultaneously, often unconsciously, which is a genuinely newer and more nuanced framing than the original 1970s-era ‘Queen Bee’ concept alone. As Queen Bees harass worker bees, worker bees also antagonize Queen Bees.
Given the new face of sexism, what can be done to educate and train workers, especially younger supervisors, about respecting the dignity of the individual? Clearly, the root cause of some sexism may be a sincere underlying, historic belief in the inherent inferiority of women held by men who know no better. After all, men tend to be bigger and stronger than women, a rational case for not including biological men in female sports.
Perhaps you disagree with me; however, I firmly believe that although some women leaders have made great strides in reclaiming their power in corporate America, for the most part, sexism still pervades our modern workplaces. The new sexism is subtler than decades ago, and may be, in some cases, harder to detect. However, the fact is that it absolutely, ultimately, and negatively impacts the bottom line.
-Frank DeDominicis
REFERENCES
- Lean In: What Is the Broken Rung?
- TIME: How the 'Broken Rung' Is Holding Women Back at Work (March 2026)
- CBS News: It's not the "glass ceiling" holding women back
- Fortune: McKinsey says the 'broken rung' is the real danger
- McKinsey Partners: What Happens When Women Support Each Other at Work? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw4UoAZEYfc
- Payscale's 2026 Gender Pay Gap Report — payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap
- Payscale's 2026 Gender Pay Gap Report — payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap. This connects directly to the McKinsey/Lean In Women in the Workplace series cited above, which now tracks motherhood status as a distinct variable.
- HISTORY.com: How Anita Hill's Testimony Made America Cringe—And Change
- TODAY.com: Anita Hill reflects on sexual harassment in the workplace (March 2024)
- USC Annenberg: Anita Hill: Still Believing
- Video: Anita Hill's full 1991 Senate testimony is archived on C-SPAN (c-span.org, search "Anita Hill testimony 1991") — the original primary-source footage referenced across all the retrospective pieces above
- Baykal, E., & Surucu, S. (2025). "A battle in the hive against the Queen Bee: reaction of female subordinates' unconscious mind." Frontiers in Sociology, 10, 1554275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1554275
- Full text: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12259625/
- PubMed listing: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40667523/
- University of Windsor (2025). "Unravelling the Queen Bee Phenomenon: Women Making Sense of this Female Leadership Paradox." https://uwindsor.scholaris.ca/items/84949709-9776-4bc9-9bf2-277a47d25e4f
- Narcikara (2018) and Derks et al. (2016) — foundational Queen Bee Syndrome framework, cited via ResearchGate: "Queen Bee Syndrome: A Modern Dilemma of Working Women and Its Effects on Turnover Intentions" https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343913536
- Video: LeanIn.Org's official Women in the Workplace report video series — youtube.com/@LeanInOrg (search "Broken Rung" for their explainer segment)
- EEOC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill settlement details, PBN Law: https://pbnlaw.com/employers-must-recognize-and-support-male-victims-of-sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace-it-is-not-as-infrequent-as-you-think
- Pasternak Law, "Sexual Harassment in the Workplace Statistics" (EEOC data analysis): https://pasternaklaw.com/sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace-statistics/
- EEOC official press releases: eeoc.gov/newsroom
- A battle in the hive against the Queen Bee: reaction of female subordinates’ unconscious mind: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12259625/
- Queen bee phenomenon in nurses; qualitative study in health sector https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31293253/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sexisms-shifting-trends-frank-dedominicis-krshc
Description: Sexism in the workplace hasn't disappeared — it's changed shape. Let’s track that shift with data and research: from the ‘glass ceiling’ to the ‘broken rung,’ a pay gap now tied closely to motherhood, and newly documented bias dynamics like Queen Bee and Worker Bee syndrome. The goal is simple — see the new sexism clearly enough to actually address it.
Recent Posts










